Verifying crypto in family-law settlements
Family-law and estate matters need reliable disclosure of crypto. Cryptographic verification reduces reliance on party-produced screenshots.
The disclosure problem
Digital assets can be under-disclosed or supported only by editable screenshots. Practitioners need evidence that a counterparty controls specific wallets or exchange balances at relevant dates.
A verification-led approach
Invite the relevant party to complete a Scrya verification for named wallets and exchange accounts. Collect signature-based wallet proofs and read-only exchange checks, then file the PDF certificate with the matter records.
Scrya never takes custody. Clients prove control from their own accounts; you receive an independent, tamper-evident certificate.
Related solutions
Keep reading
What is proof of reserves?
Proof of reserves is evidence that claimed crypto assets exist and are controlled. Scrya applies that idea at client level: prove wallet or exchange control, then issue a verification certificate.
Proof of reserves vs proof of solvency
Proof of reserves focuses on assets under control. Proof of solvency compares assets to liabilities. Professionals verifying a client’s holdings usually need ownership and balance evidence first.
How to verify crypto ownership without taking custody
You can confirm crypto ownership without taking custody: clients sign from their wallets or grant read-only exchange access, balances are checked, and results are sealed into a PDF certificate.
